Stephen
Glass composed articles for New
Republic magazine that were entirely fabricated or
contained only bits and pieces of the truth. Glass was able to get
away with it for so long due to the fact that he was entertaining,
charismatic, and a former fact checker that knew how to cover up his
lies. The depths he went to cover up his lies was astonishing, like
the fake telephone numbers, notes, and websites. Even when he was
cornered and confronted, he was not able to fess up and come clean.
Along with his fake stories, he was able to create this fake office
persona with false modesty, entertaining stories, empty compliments,
which made him extremely likable in the workplace. Although he may
have had a psychological disorder, he knowingly lied because he
wanted attention and praise. He was a pathological liar that was
determined to get people to like him, respect his work, and receive a
Pulitzer. However, he did not ethics or patience to build a real body
of work worthy of the distinguished award. He knew that
sensationalized and entertaining stories would garnish him the
attention and accolades that he craved. If he would have just worked
harder to seek out actual stories instead of cooking his pieces, he
would have made an excellent journalist, like Chuck Lane. Glass
raised several ethical flags that should have caught by the editors
of the New Republic right away since it is a prestigious magazine
that influenced policies makers. It is the responsibility of
communicators, especially in the news industry, to present the facts
of an event accurately and objectively. While he was an excellent
liar, there were several warning signs that his editors and
colleagues at the New Republic were not able to pick up on due
to the fact that they liked him. For example, his first editor,
Michael Kelly, was not able to objectively review Glass' work because
they were friends. When a couple elements of his story, "Spring
Breakdown" did not add up, Kelly only made one phone call that
didn't exactly clear With such a exaggerated story being published in
the "in flight magazine of Air Force One", he should have
looked into it a little further.
25/25
ReplyDelete